Tag co-occurrence across the whole network, built entirely from our own tagging. The graphic that justifies the hub.
0 items6 items
View as table
Critical Infrastructure
Indo-Pacific
Sanctions
Chokepoints
Alliances
Weekly Analysis
Launch Industry
Space Security
Cyber Norms
LNG
ukraine
us-russia
Critical Infrastructure
—
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
Indo-Pacific
0
—
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sanctions
0
0
—
1
1
6
0
0
0
2
4
5
Chokepoints
0
1
1
—
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
Alliances
0
1
1
1
—
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Weekly Analysis
0
0
6
2
1
—
0
0
0
1
6
6
Launch Industry
0
0
0
0
0
0
—
3
0
0
0
0
Space Security
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
—
0
0
0
0
Cyber Norms
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
—
0
0
0
LNG
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
—
1
1
ukraine
0
0
4
1
0
6
0
0
0
1
—
5
us-russia
0
0
5
1
0
6
0
0
0
1
5
—
Source: this network's own tagging (content_tags), across all seven sites
Every other chart here is drawn from someone else's data. This one is drawn from the network's own structure: how often two topics appear on the same piece, across all seven domains.
It is the one graphic that demonstrates rather than asserts why these are a network and not seven separate blogs. The bright cells are where the domains genuinely overlap — where an energy story is also a chokepoint story, or a cyber story is also a sanctions story — and those intersections are where cross-posting earns its keep.
It also works as an editorial diagnostic: a topic with no bright cells is one this network is covering in isolation.